Synthesizing Stephen Crothers (or why I no longer believe in the Big Bang)

The Big Bang Never Happened

Bill Gaede is a man who wants to draw a clear distinction between math and physics. In his view, the current crops of physicists are really mathematicians who have lost their ways by straying too far from realistic explanations of natural phenomena. The mathematicians championed such abstract concepts as zero form particles, particle-wave duality, and particle-mediate carriers of forces. Mr. Gaede's proposes a "rope hypothesis" which, in the case of gravity, the torsional force linking every bodies in the universe implies instantaneous actions at a distance. Viewed this way, if the Sun would suddenly disappear, the earth's movement would immediately fly off on a near straight line. The current belief is that it would take about 8 minutes for the earth to feel this effect.

The rope hypothesis partitions space into sets of preset gravitational potentials. If a celestial body is not present, there is immediately no potential on the other body. The rope hypothesis is a static concept, thus is free of a force mediator associated with a dynamical force field.

One video to another, we are led to the cases of black holes and the big bang. Mr. Gaede interviewed Stephen Crothers, a science dissident because, according to his web site, he was unjustly denied from earning his Ph.D. Mr. Crothers is a man who would run circles around most GR theorists. Remember here that we are discussing the pure theoretical foundation for the existence of black holes here. This means that Mr. Crothers is not a lightweight hand-waving theorist but a master in mathematical symbolic manipulation.

Mr. Crothers contends that the physics of singularities are wrong because:

1. In the Einstein's field equations,

Einstein Tensor (curvature of ST) = Energy Momentum Tensor (matter that causes g) (I)

In case of black hole,

right side = 0 (set by theorists, no source/matter) (II)

(I) reduces to Ricci = 0

Left side is field outside the body due to black hole.

But theorists already set source to not present. This is a contradiction.


In case of Schwartzschild ST, right side = 0, yet theorists maintain there's a source present. (III)

Then in the De Sitter ST, EMT present but no source. (IV)

(III) and (IV) contradicts.

In case of the Big Bang, Schwartzschild ST contains no matter, only a generalization of Minkowski ST (pure geometry object) => no bearing on Einstein's field equations.

Since EMT != 0 ...total energy of gravitation field == 0

So, it's impossible to localize gravitational energy => no gravitational waves.

Einstein's Tensor = EMT = 0 violates energy/momentum conservation. So...projects such as LIGO is in vain.

Einstein's fields equations are invalid ==> big bang cosmology is invalid.

It doesn't help that Einstein had doubt that physics can be based on the field concept. More recently, the icon of modern physics Roger Penrose also said that QM may be wrong.

I personally don't like the concept of infinite mass and zero dimension. My own theory is that all objects and systems of objects in the universe have some intrinsic angular momentum. The focal point of their orbits are the centers of mass. At any point in time, the bodies would fall toward the center of mass and miss. This is because the information about the center of mass travels at infinite speed -- or like Mr Gaede's rope hypothesis and principle of instantaneous action -- but the motion toward center of mass is not. By the time the bodies come close to the center of mass, a new center of mass has been conveyed and it is different from the previous.

Back to Mr. Gaede, he ended the video thinking the universe is a perpetual motion machine without a beginning and an end. I recall Prof. Michio Kaku's comment that to an ant, the earth may as well be two dimensional. Is it possible that we're just ants in the universe? Is the universe really infinite or it's just a result of our limited perception? the limit of our deductive reasoning? We can't really assume the state of things based on mere anthropocentric definitions alone.

Cure for The Swine Flu?

Fortunately, I'm not in the position to experiment with the flu virus so I can't say I'm very confident. Keep in mind that, like the cure for the common cold, we assert that viral load matters - less is always better. Also, we are focusing on the first stage or the innate immune response and try to amplify its effectiveness. From the list of symptoms associated with the flu - as listed on Wikipedia (1) - the following is a list of logical things to do:

Symptom / What one should do
-------------------------------
coughs / cough a lot more
runny nose / blow nose a lot more as in my Common Cold video
high fever / cover up oneself in multiple layers of blankets
vomiting, diarrhea / take HCL pills to kill virus in the stomach and the intestine
muscle ache / I'm not really sure how to explain this so I can't devise a way to "help" the body.
lack of appetite / eat less just to have enough energy to function

Unlike the common cold virus which mainly inhabits the nasal passage, we can see that the flu virus is everywhere in the body. As always, do this the moment you think you have the flu. Wait too long and the virus will multiply and overwhelm the immune system.

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Symptoms_of_swine_flu.svg

Fish Human

Howard T Odum thought that free economic systems evolve according to the Maximum Power Principle.

Here, application of the same principle to fish farming.  Temperature gradient is managed so that fishes grow at the fastest rate.

http://und.edu/dept/biology/kelsch/Maximum%20power%20principle.pdf

HIV/AIDs Related Info

I researched this because I'm owning their stock shares. Hopefully, it will be successful going through all the trial phases.

http://www.panacos.com/documents/panacosmovie.html

Another vid on YT about HIV -
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RO8MP3wMvqg

Kuby's Immunology also has good info on HIV/AIDs.

Immunotherapy

"Researchers in the US who were treating the patient extracted white blood cells, the key component of the immune system, and grew one type the infection-fighting CD4+ T cells in the laboratory. The cloned T cells, which had been vastly expanded, were then reinfused to the patient to fight the cancer."

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=204&objectid=10517282

Why didn't I think of this? Now that I had failed, I'm thinking about all sort of possibilities. The body, esp. of those with a compromised immune system, is an inferior cell plant. Outside the body and inside the lab, there shouldn't be anything getting in the way of production scaling of whatever type of cells that are needed. What if AIDS patients are treated this way, while at the same time, be on some sort of cocktail drugs to that keep viral population at a minimum?

Cold News

A researcher with JHU is paving the path for possible new drugs that block production of two key proteins involved in inflammation of the nasal passage. This is great. It means basically symptom-less colds and quick recovery (<3 days?) See link

http://www.jhu.edu/~gazette/2008/19may08/19immune.html

Common cold con't & AIDS/HIV

I wonder if the common cold is something in the domain of humoral response. If it is that then IL-4 overexpression may cause the virus to be cleared earlier.

Also, AIDS is primarily a disease of a compromised cell-mediated response. What if the opposite of IL-4 overexpression is performed? Would it boost cell-mediate response, enhancing effectiveness of drugs?

I'm going too deep into unknown territory here.

http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/full/jimmunol;163/8/4546

Although not related, this paper says something about IL-4 overexpression and prevention of cartilage destruction. The vector is a cold virus?